Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics

Good article reassessment for Norman Osborn

Norman Osborn has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Knull (character)#Requested move 26 October 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Knull (character)#Requested move 26 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 06:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth

Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Wolverine's first solo story?

I had moved a note from the lead of the article to the publication history but the other editor restored it to the lead [1] and started a discussion on the article's talk page at Talk:Wolverine (character)#First solo story. to discuss with this content is significant enough to be included in the lead. Also to be resolved, should we be saying it is his first solo story, or that it could have been his first solo story? If anyone has any input to add, please go contribute to that discussion. BOZ (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Mac Gargan#Requested move 27 November 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Mac Gargan#Requested move 27 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Batman in film

Batman in film has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Page moves by new user

New user User:Saladinger made several major undiscussed page moves but was blocked temporarily by User:BD2412. We may need to review each of these, possibly discuss or revert some. BOZ (talk) 23:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

I have reverted all of them (except for the moves of pages that were already redirects, which are more easily retargeted. Longstanding titles for heavily edited articles such as these should never be moved by a novice editor without discussion. BD2412 T 23:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help. David A (talk) 05:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Turns out they were yet another sock of a long-banned editor, so everything should have been reverted anyway. :) BOZ (talk) 06:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

@BD2412, we have another new user moving pages around... [2] BOZ (talk) 22:50, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

These seem to be qualitatively better moves, though. BD2412 T 00:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

They did unilaterally move Spot (character) to The Spot (character) (which goes about the WP:NCC norm) during an RM and are surely very opinionated on some decision-based discussions for such an apparent relatively new editor, which should almost never be done without discussion as some of them may not be uncontroversial (such as the Spot one). I would still push for an SPI to WP:CHECK due to the similar nature of their edits. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

9 times out of 10, a heavily active new editor who knows their way around policies and makes a lot of controversial actions turns out to be a sock of a banned editor. I always hope for that 10% of the time, but it usually turns out that they are a sock. BOZ (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

@Trailblazer101 the fact that they ignored your warning on their talk page about doing page moves is also concerning. BOZ (talk) 13:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

And here we go again, they were a sock of the same blocked user as the last sock, blocked this time by @Ponyo. BOZ (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

If you see new users doing making these edits you can report them at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TotalTruthTeller24.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

@Ponyo what would we do in the case of an IP making similar edits?[3] BOZ (talk) 23:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

You can drop a note on my talk page, or ping me, or report at the SPI I linked.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

@Ponyo the Jocasta article might need semi-protection for now since he is going to want to keep coming back with IPs and socks: [4] BOZ (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Spot (character)#Requested move 1 December 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Spot (character)#Requested move 1 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Fantastic Four in film

Fantastic Four in film has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Merger discussion for West Coast Avengers (comic book)

An article which may be of interest to members of this project—West Coast Avengers (comic book)—has been proposed for merging with West Coast Avengers. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 04:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)